Nakpro
Platinum Whey Isolate 90%
- Protein
- 90g/100g
- Cost
- ₹2.7/g
- Confidence
- Batch-tested signal
Brands, products, and comparisons.
Browse protein products sold in India, from powders to bars and drinks. Explore the categories or compare 53 scored products by ingredients, protein content, and cost.
Search the library for a product’s ingredients, score breakdown, and testing records.
Platinum Whey Isolate 90%
Raw Whey Protein 80% Unflavoured
100% Whey Protein Isolate
R1 Protein Whey Isolate
ISO 100 Hydrolysed Whey Isolate
Platinum Whey Isolate 90% is the current top-scoring CLW Pick in the library. Check the entry’s protein content and supporting records, then confirm that they match the flavour and batch you plan to buy.
Early - Mid 2026 Edition
92CLWWellcore100% Whey Protein IsolateBatch-tested signal#492CLWRule OneR1 Protein Whey IsolateCertification-linked#5
89CLWAS-IT-IS NutritionWhey Protein Concentrate 80%Batch-tested signal#7
87CLWAvvatarFuel WheyBatch-tested signal#9
86CLWOnly What's NeededWhey Protein Concentrate (Cocoa)Provisional estimateBrand logos are trademarks of their respective owners and companies and are used here only for identification in an editorial comparison.
Choose a powder by your priorities, compare two products, or estimate a monthly budget.
Platinum Whey Isolate 90%
100% Whey Protein Isolate
Raw Whey Protein 80% Unflavoured
Platinum Whey Isolate 90%
Raw Whey Protein 80% Unflavoured
Nakpro: Batch-tested signal. MuscleBlaze: Batch-tested signal. Treat this as an evidence snapshot; formulas, labels, and batch certificates can change.
Patterns in the products we cover, based on their scores, prices, and available records. These observations do not replace batch testing.
26 of 53 scored products are Watch or Avoid by the CLW rubric.
CleanLabel° Protein ShelfNakpro scores above Dymatize while landing about Rs 4.0 lower per gram of protein by CLW estimate.
CleanLabel° Protein ShelfCLW flags watch notes such as free amino acids, creatine, opaque blends, or discordant protein claims; exact product accusations require records for that batch.
CleanLabel° Protein Shelf2 of 7 plant rows are CLW Picks. The rest need a slower label read.
CleanLabel° Protein ShelfTrustified-listed reports, certification pages, and batch-level evidence lift confidence more than front-panel protein grams alone.
CleanLabel° Protein ShelfWhey, plant protein, and mass gainers should not be judged with the same mental shortcut. Each shelf has a different common problem.
Whey has the deepest shelf and the widest score spread. Higher-scoring products tend to combine protein density with batch reports or certification records.
Plant formulas need more scrutiny because source quality, flavour systems, and digestibility vary more than the front label suggests.
Mass gainers are judged differently from simple protein powders: cheap calories can make the tub look like value while diluting protein utility.
Read about serving sizes, protein sources, and how protein quality is measured.
You can spend ₹3,000 a month, train hard, and still miss the protein you thought you bought. The fix is calm label reading: scoop size, protein source, amino profile, and testing details before the shiny claim.
8 minute readMacro ScienceProtein Types Flooding India: What They Mean, Who They Fit, and What to AvoidIndia’s protein boom now spans pharmacies, marketplaces, and quick-commerce apps. You’ll see whey, plant blends, mass gainers, clear drinks, bars, and meal replacements in one scroll. The front says protein. The source and formula decide whether it actually fits your goal.
8 minute readLabel literacyThe Smart Indian's Guide to Reading a Protein LabelMost supplement mistakes happen after choosing a brand and right before checkout. The missed step is the label read: serving size, ingredient order, protein type, and legal details.
7 minute readMacro ScienceProtein grams are not the same as protein quality. DIAAS is the score missing from most labels.Why protein claims need digestibility, amino acid balance, and source context.
8 minute readEvery product is scored across six public dimensions. Treat the score as a shortlist, then verify the current label, flavour, and batch before buying.
Protein per 100g, taken from a label, estimate, or published test. The source is identified for each product; an estimate is not a product-specific assay.
How closely the label is supported by third-party reports, category research, certification records, or provisional label checks.
DIAAS or source-quality estimate based on the protein type unless a product-specific assay is stated.
Estimated price per gram of protein, using the recorded protein content and public price assumptions.
How efficiently can the body absorb and utilise this protein? Factors in protein form and enzyme addition.
Receipt quality, ingredient-list clarity, evidence confidence, batch evidence, and protein-spiking watch notes.
CLW combines evidence confidence, label transparency, protein density, protein-source quality estimates, digestibility notes, price assumptions, additive watchouts, and product pages or batch reports where available. Scores marked provisional are not lab certificates.
Scoring thresholds and dimension weights are proprietary to CleanLabel° and are not published. Product-specific adverse conclusions require sources identifying the current product, batch, and claim.
No. A CLW score is a guide built from the evidence available for that product: peer-reviewed category evidence, public batch reports, certification pages, official product pages, label details, and provisional estimates where independent proof is missing.
Watch means the product may be plausible, but the stored evidence does not resolve the current batch, flavour, formula, or transparency question well enough for a clean recommendation.
No. CLW flags spiking watch notes such as free amino acids, creatine, opaque blends, or discordant protein claims. Product-specific accusations need records identifying the exact product and batch.
Yes. Protein products change by batch, flavour, price, certificate status, and reformulation. Treat the page as a current shortlist, then verify the label and evidence before buying.
If you are buying, start with the Smart Matcher or CLW Picks. If you already own a tub, search the brand or use Face-off. If you are researching the category, start with the findings and category breakdown.
Charts and library previews may use a sample until the complete brand table is unlocked with email.
CleanLabel° maps Indian protein products across 6 CLW dimensions. This is a source-confidence snapshot, not a lab certificate for every row.
49% of products are either CLW Avoid or flagged for transparency concerns by the CLW rubric. 27 of 53 products are CLW Picks.
Protein-spiking risk is a documented category concern. CLW flags products where public labels or lab reports indicate free amino acids, creatine, opaque blends, or discordant protein claims.
Some lower-priced products score strongly on the CLW rubric, while some premium products remain Watch because the stored evidence is not enough to resolve transparency questions.
Trustified-listed reports, certification-program pages, public batch reports, and official product pages materially improve transparency. Products without independent or batch-level evidence remain Watch even when their ingredient list looks strong.
Viral Indian brands are now selling fermented yeast, pea-rice blends, and clean-positioned whey powders. The protein source and batch evidence matter as much as the front-panel grams.
Dr Cyriac Abby Philips et al., Citizens Protein Project, Medicine (2024). CLW uses this as category-level evidence. Adverse product-specific claims still need exact product and batch records.
Public Trustified references can show tested batches and lab results. CLW treats them as batch-specific records, not permanent brand endorsements.
Informed Sport, Informed Choice, NSF, and similar marks can be SKU, flavour, market, and batch specific. Verify the current tub before relying on athlete-safe status.
For brands without independent lab data, CLW scores are based on publicly known ingredient lists, category norms, FSSAI filings, and market data. These scores must not be cited as factual conclusions without product-specific lab verification.
New-age additions use brand product pages for current ingredient, macro, certification, and claim references. These are brand-published claims unless an independent report is linked.
CLW scores use a weighted formula across 6 dimensions. Verdicts marked Provisional are based on publicly known ingredient lists, category norms, and market data — they must not be published as factual conclusions without product-specific lab verification. Peer-reviewed research is used as category evidence unless an exact product receipt is linked. Trustified and certification-program claims are batch/SKU-specific. DIAAS values are category estimates based on FAO/WHO 2013 reference values unless a product assay is stated.